Skip to content
DC Report
Menu
  • Top Stories
  • Headlines
  • Wires
  • Subscribe
Menu

9th Circuit Blasted by Own Judge for Ruling Allowing Men in Religious Women’s Spaces

Posted on March 17, 2026 by PG Newser

After the U.S. 9th circuit court ruled religious groups cannot keep trans men out of women’s spaces, they receive a fiery dissent. 9th Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke began his dissent with the phrase, “This is a case about swinging d#%ks.”

He then added, “The fact that the religious owners of a traditional Korean, women-only, nude spa are prohibited by law from preventing a naked adult male, who remains sexually attracted to women, from exposing himself to thirteen-year-old girls tragically illustrates the sick and twisted consequences of erasing sex as a coherent legal category

My distressed colleagues appear to have the fastidious sensibilities of a Victorian nun when it comes to mere unpleasant words in my opinion, yet exhibit the scruples of our dearly departed colleague Judge Reinhardt when it comes to the government trampling on religious liberties and exposing women and girls to male genitalia,” he wrote. “That kind of selective outrage speaks for itself.”

Blurb:

Judge Blasts Liberal Colleagues For Forcing Christian Spa To Allow Men In Women’s Space: “Collectively Lost Their Minds” – louderwithcrowder.com

According to Judge Lawrence VanDyke, “the supposed adults in the room have collectively lost their minds.” He said this in response to his colleagues forcing a Chrisitan spa to admit men into female-only spaces.

According to TPM:

“This is a case about swinging dicks,” began 9th Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke in his dissent.

The case in question centered on the policy of two Korean spas in Washington state that allowed only “biological women” to use their services — or more specifically, barred trans women who had not yet undergone surgery. Washington’s Human Rights Commission took enforcement action against the spas for violating an anti-discrimination state law. The spas sued, arguing that the enforcement action had violated their First Amendment rights. A district court dismissed the complaint, and a 9th Circuit panel upheld that dismissal. In a Thursday ruling, the full 9th Circuit declined to rehear the case.

Headlines Missed

  • Planvasion EU – The Birth of the Ecumenical Nation-State October 16, 2026
    By Paul Gordon Collier, Editor “All these curses shall come upon you and pursue you and overtake you till you are destroyed, because you did not obey the voice of the Lord your God, to keep his commandments and his statutes ...
  • Final Thought – Midterm Madness October 16, 2026
    By Bill Collier, Publisher “I see it all the time, that when Trump’s on the ballot, they win. When he’s out of the ballot, the people don’t go to vote, and I’m asking the people … to get out and vote. ...
  • AI debt looming threat on World Economy October 16, 2026
    The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has issued a warning to global markets about the looming debt in the AI industry. It claims all the major American tech companies are saddled with AI investment bills not met with AI-producing revenues. IMF Warns ...

People Advance

  • Brennan Lawsuit Dropped
    Former CIA Director John Brennan will not be able to go forward with his lawsuit against the Trump administration. The ...
  • ICE Unmasking Struck Down by 9th
    An effort by progressive California to unmask ICE agents in an effort to help their street fighters locate and terrorize ...
  • Greenland Gold Coming America’s Way
    Trump: ‘Massive Oil, Gas, and Mineral Exploration’ Ready to Go in Greenland– legalinsurrection.com News Source EXCERPT: President Donald Trump announced that the ...
  • Son of Bolsonaro Wins Brazil’s Presidential First Round
    While his father sits in prison, Flavio Bolsonaro is beating the man who imprisoned him, Lula da Silver, in the ...
©2026 DC Report | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme