Skip to content
DC Report
Menu
  • Top Stories
  • Headlines
  • Wires
  • Subscribe
Menu

9th Circuit Blasted by Own Judge for Ruling Allowing Men in Religious Women’s Spaces

Posted on March 17, 2026 by PG Newser

After the U.S. 9th circuit court ruled religious groups cannot keep trans men out of women’s spaces, they receive a fiery dissent. 9th Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke began his dissent with the phrase, “This is a case about swinging d#%ks.”

He then added, “The fact that the religious owners of a traditional Korean, women-only, nude spa are prohibited by law from preventing a naked adult male, who remains sexually attracted to women, from exposing himself to thirteen-year-old girls tragically illustrates the sick and twisted consequences of erasing sex as a coherent legal category

My distressed colleagues appear to have the fastidious sensibilities of a Victorian nun when it comes to mere unpleasant words in my opinion, yet exhibit the scruples of our dearly departed colleague Judge Reinhardt when it comes to the government trampling on religious liberties and exposing women and girls to male genitalia,” he wrote. “That kind of selective outrage speaks for itself.”

Blurb:

Judge Blasts Liberal Colleagues For Forcing Christian Spa To Allow Men In Women’s Space: “Collectively Lost Their Minds” – louderwithcrowder.com

According to Judge Lawrence VanDyke, “the supposed adults in the room have collectively lost their minds.” He said this in response to his colleagues forcing a Chrisitan spa to admit men into female-only spaces.

According to TPM:

“This is a case about swinging dicks,” began 9th Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke in his dissent.

The case in question centered on the policy of two Korean spas in Washington state that allowed only “biological women” to use their services — or more specifically, barred trans women who had not yet undergone surgery. Washington’s Human Rights Commission took enforcement action against the spas for violating an anti-discrimination state law. The spas sued, arguing that the enforcement action had violated their First Amendment rights. A district court dismissed the complaint, and a 9th Circuit panel upheld that dismissal. In a Thursday ruling, the full 9th Circuit declined to rehear the case.

Headlines Missed

  • A Peaceful and Quiet Election Approach October 30, 2026
    FINAL THOUGHT: LAST COMMENTS ON THE UPCOMING 2026 MIDTERM ELECTION By Paul Gordon Collier, Editor, and Bill Collier, Publisher “First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are ...
  • U.S. Japan Military Drills Disrupted by Chinese and Russian Spy Planes October 29, 2026
    While the U.S. and Japan were engaged in military drills in the Indo Pacific, China and Russia sent spy planes to disrupt the action. Japanese fighters were scrambled to escort the spy planes out of the region. The drills involve ...
  • China Wins in U.S. Court October 29, 2026
    A Federal judge has decided the Pentagon does not have a right to block firms from having defense contracts that lobby for Alibaba. The company rewarded in the ruling is a CCP-controlled and supporting enterprise. This ruling allows the CCP ...

People Advance

  • Alleged Classified Leaker Arrested
    The FBI arrested a former CIA contractor, Ian Brinksman, 42, for allegedly leaking classified information through his Substack blog. An ...
  • SCOTUS Shuts Down Activist Immigration Judges
    The Supreme Court is barring judges from ruling on deportations until the appeals process has run its full course. The ...
  • One Million Barrels of Oil from Venezuela
    President Trump announced on Truth Social the arrival of 1 million barrels of oil coming from Venezuela at no expense ...
  • DEI Defeated Despite Judge’s AI “Ruling”
    The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down Judge Henry Wingate’s ruling that ruled an anti-DEI Mississippi Law was unconstitutional. ...
©2026 DC Report | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme